Banned Books (and Novel Ideas) Fall 2011 11:00-12:30 (34547)
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Losing Oneself
(24 min)
This is the first scene where Howard Campbell begins to lose himself. By committing himself to a cause he does not believe in and through his job as a propagandist he brainwashes others through his speeches and begins to brainwash himself. He breaks his commitment with Helga to stay true to their "nation of two" by not telling her who he really is. If he cannot be true to his wife (in his opinion their "nation of two" is greater than both America and Germany) how is he able to be true to himself and know who he really is? This followed by the death of his wife and the horrors of war allows Campbell's original self to be destroyed and replaced by the new Campbell who he had originally pretended to be. Without Helga to keep him in touch with reality Campbell has no way to know who he really is. Eventually he becomes engulfed by his work as a propagandist and embodies the beliefs of the Nazis.
Do the people around you effect who you are? How do the traumas of war effect our personalities?
Mother Night
"You broke my heart when you married my daughter.
--Yes, I know.
I wanted a German soldier for a son-in-law. Because I hated you so much, I studied you. I listened to everything you said. Never missed a broadcast. Did you know that until this very moment, nothing would have delighted me more than to prove you were a spy, to see you shot? Now I couldn't care less if you are a spy.
- Do you know why?
- No.
Because now I know that even if you were a spy, you could never have served the enemy as well as you served us. All the ideals that make me proud of being a Nazi... they came not from Hitler, not from Goebbels but from you. You alone kept me from concluding that Germany had gone insane."
--Conversation between Howard Campbell and Herr Noth.
In the scene preceding this conversation, Campbell admits in a monologue that he is an American spy. He says he hasn't told his wife about who he is because 'politics has no place in their nation of two' and to prevent her from living in constant fear.
Campbell is caught up in espionage and has done such a remarkable job to this point that higher-ranking officials including his father-in-law, the Police Chief, trust him.Campbell explains that the "moral is to be careful what you pretend to be because in the end you are who you pretend to be"; suggesting that he may become a member of the Nazis since he has lived as one for so long. He had been told by the American officials he reported to that if caught, they would deny knowing of his existence as a American or
a spy. Do you agree that pretending to be something you're not can eventually result in actually believing you are that?
"Because in the end, you are who you pretend to be."
Given that he took responsibility for his actions and assuming his blue fairy godmother later testified that he was a spy, did he effectively clear his name and manage to let the world know who he really was and what his motivations really were?
War Crimes
Mother Night
- Do you know why?- No.
Because now I know that even if you were a spy, you could never have served the enemy as well as you
served us. All the ideals that make me proud of being a Nazi... they came not from Hitler,
not from Goebbels but from you. You alone kept me from concluding that Germany had gone insane."
--Conversation between Howard Campbell and Herr Noth.
In the scene preceding this conversation, Campbell admits in a monologue that he is an American spy.
He says he hasn't told his wife about who he is because 'politics has no place in their nation of two'
and to prevent her from living in constant fear.
Campbell is caught up in espionage and has done such a remarkable job to this point that he is trusted by
higher ranking officials including his father-in-law, the Police Chief. Campbell explains that the "moral
is to be careful what you pretend to be because in the end you are who you pretend to be."; suggesting that
he may become a member of the Nazis since he has lived as one for so long. He had been told by the
American officials he reported to that if caught, they would deny knowing of his existence as a American or
a spy.
Do you agree that pretending to be something you're not can eventually result in actually believing you are that?
Death: The Moral of the Story
We meet Resi North here, played by Kirsten Dunst, as the Russian Army comes to overtake her childhood home. Resi is sitting on the couch with her dog and seems to be completely content with the upcoming murder of her pet, which will be shot by Howard Campbell. Before they part, Resi confesses her love for Howard and her envy of his relationship with her sister Helga. This scene is particularly chilling because of Resi's absolute dismissal of her dog, yet the maturity of her developing feelings for Howard. Her feelings toward death as the only thing she believes in foreshadows her own death later after she pretends to be Helga. Though young in appearance, Resi's mature demeanor is not to be dismissed. This solidifies Vonnegut's primary theme: "the moral of the story." It's easy to not take Resi seriously because of her age, but it's important to not fully dismiss pretenses because they often turn out to be true.
Resi seems to dismiss the things that will hurt her, attempting to put up a wall against letting the permanence of death give her reason to mourn. Her maturity at such a young age helps her cope and grow into a strong minded female. Though Resi seems to be strong, is it really that important that she creates these notions at such an early age? Would her life be more successful if she had a "normal" childhood?
All The World's A Stage!
Page 257, when Howard W. Campbell Jr. asks Dr. Epstein to turn him into Israeli police:
“This is not the first time you’ve seen eyes like that,” [Mrs. Epstein] said to her son in German, “not the first man you’ve seen who could not move unless someone told him where to move, who longed for someone to tell him what to do next, who would do anything anyone told him to do next. You saw thousands of them in Auschwitz.”
[...]
“You still want revenge?” [Epstein] asked [his mother].
“Yes,” she said.
He put his face close to mine. “And you really want to be punished?” he said.
“I want to be tried,” I said.
“It’s all play acting,” [Epstein] said, exasperated with both of us. “It proves nothing!”
This passage encompasses many of the important issues of the novel, ones that I can hopefully address without rambling. What does identity mean, and who is it defined by? Are we responsible for our actions? To what extent are we both the victims and the persecutors in war? Finally, what is the meaning of life?
Identity in Mother Night is often dramatically ironic because of the novel’s premise: Howard Campbell is a spy for the Americans, but everyone in the world except for three people believe him to be a Nazi propaganda agent. There is a noteworthy divide between Campbell’s essence and the “character” he must play, but does it really matter if no one knows this inner person? I think Vonnegut actually quite explicitly answers this question, though with tongue-in-cheek, when he states: “We are what we pretend to be.” As in, Campbell’s identity has been externalized to the point where he decides to give himself up to the Israelis, because after all, he is this Nazi persona to everyone else in the world. I don’t think this is a case of cognitive dissonance either, which would suggest he turns himself in because his thoughts must conform to his actions. I think it is more indicative of his fatalism, if anything. He must accept the consequences of his actions, even IF he didn’t mean them inwardly, because he views his path as inevitable. Perhaps there is some truth in Adolf Eichmann’s advice--the secret of success is evincing what is expected of you.
It is also interesting to note the contrast between Epstein’s mother and Campbell in this scene. Life is without objective meaning or direction, as attested by the thousands of Auschwitz victims who “longed for someone to tell them what to do next.” Therefore, characters must create their own purposes in life: Epstein’s mother wants revenge, and Campbell wants to be tried for his crimes against humanity. (Note that this is not always what his purpose is--at the beginning, it seems his meaning in life is to love Helga. Likewise, O’Hare’s purpose is to kill Campbell, nihilistic Resi’s purpose is to find a purpose, and Kraft defines his purpose as primarily artistic.) To me, it is intriguing that Epstein’s mother wants revenge here. She serves as a device to demonstrate that humans all have a hateful side--fascists killed people they deemed as weaker out of self-righteousness, but those persecuted can be driven to hatred just as easily. The distinction between “enemy” and “friend” is blurred throughout the novel, and perhaps Vonnegut is saying that these are just more roles people create.
Discussion: Is everyone in the world merely playing a part? If so, how can we define truth? Is there absolute anything?